ENVISION CARY - Results

Number of responses: 213

What is your sex?

Male
64.22%
131
Female
35.78%
73


In which age group do you fall?

Under 18
0
18-25
0.98%
2
26-35
21.08%
43
36-45
38.24%
78
46-55
22.06%
45
56-65
9.80%
20
66-75
5.39%
11
Over 75
2.45%
5


Where do you live?

Inside Cary
95.63%
197
Outside Cary but Within Wake County
3.40%
7
Outside Wake County
0.97%
2


If you are a Cary resident, how long have you lived here?

Not a Cary Resident
2.97%
6
Less than 1 year
3.47%
7
1-5 years
30.69%
62
6-10 years
28.22%
57
11-20 years
20.79%
42
More than 20 years
13.86%
28


What is your race?

Caucasian/White
91.96%
183
African American
2.51%
5
Native- American
0.50%
1
Asian
2.51%
5
Hispanic
0.50%
1
Other
2.01%
4


1. Improve the Roads APF (adequate public facilities) requirements to recognize that there should be a reasonable limit on the number of through lanes on roadways, emphasizing quality of roads in addition to quantity. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
5.34%
11
2
1.46%
3
3
1.46%
3
4
2.43%
5
5
7.77%
16
6
8.74%
18
7
24.76%
51
8
21.84%
45
9
26.21%
54


2. Develop a street network with appropriate connectivity by establishing guidelines for collector/connector streets, implementing a wide range of bold traffic calming measures, and requiring high-quality streets and connections at destinations. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
7.28%
15
2
1.46%
3
3
2.43%
5
4
1.94%
4
5
4.85%
10
6
9.22%
19
7
18.45%
38
8
22.82%
47
9
31.55%
65


3. Create arterial street design guidelines and/or standards that address street width, on-street parking, superior level of quality, traffic calming, and high-performance two-lane streets. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
3.88%
8
2
1.94%
4
3
0.97%
2
4
1.46%
3
5
5.83%
12
6
9.71%
20
7
21.84%
45
8
22.82%
47
9
31.55%
65


4. Improve land development regulations to enhance town-building that would require well-designed streets for commercial and institutional development; mandatory urban design guidelines that address building placement, massing, form, etc. (not architecture); and major urban street features (under an advanced APF ordinance) concurrent with current commercial development. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
4.39%
9
2
2.44%
5
3
3.90%
8
4
1.46%
3
5
12.20%
25
6
6.34%
13
7
24.39%
50
8
17.07%
35
9
27.80%
57


5. Support multi-mode travel by facilitating imaginative planning for the Town’s two station areas on the TTA light rail line – focusing development at nodes instead of strip commercial development. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
15.12%
31
2
3.90%
8
3
4.88%
10
4
1.95%
4
5
11.22%
23
6
6.83%
14
7
16.59%
34
8
9.76%
20
9
29.76%
61


6. Encourage development that supports pedestrians and bicyclists through continued implementation of programs, including emphasis on creating a bike network that serves different types of riders through wide outside lanes, designated on-street bike lanes, multi-use paths, and greenways. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
8.29%
17
2
1.95%
4
3
1.46%
3
4
1.95%
4
5
8.29%
17
6
6.34%
13
7
8.78%
18
8
11.71%
24
9
51.22%
105


7. Support management of transit efforts to ensure effective integration of regional mass transit, feeder buses, rail, and other transportation modes. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
14.22%
29
2
3.43%
7
3
4.41%
9
4
3.43%
7
5
5.88%
12
6
7.84%
16
7
15.20%
31
8
11.76%
24
9
33.82%
69


8. Require strong integration of mass transit features in developments (e.g., connections, sidewalks, and shelters). (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
15.27%
31
2
3.45%
7
3
4.93%
10
4
2.96%
6
5
3.94%
8
6
7.88%
16
7
14.29%
29
8
12.32%
25
9
34.98%
71


9. Pursue methods to implement a range of transportation demand management strategies such as car pools, van pools, transit, exit ramp meters, non-peak work hours, HOV (high occupancy vehicle) lanes and telecommuting. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
11.22%
23
2
4.39%
9
3
7.32%
15
4
2.44%
5
5
11.22%
23
6
8.78%
18
7
16.59%
34
8
9.76%
20
9
28.29%
58


10. please prioritize the following modes of local, non-recreational transportation based on your estimated usage. By local, non-recreational, we mean traveling to/from specific destinations such as work, shopping, or school. Consider weather and year-round use when you decide. Place a 1 for highest usage, 2 for next Next highest and continue until complete.
Bus

1
14.87%
29
2
5.13%
10
3
6.67%
13
4
3.59%
7
5
4.10%
8
6
3.08%
6
7
3.59%
7
8
2.05%
4
9
4.10%
8
10
5.64%
11
11
5.64%
11
12
3.59%
7
13
3.59%
7
14
34.36%
67


Bicycle- On Greenways

1
11.79%
23
2
6.67%
13
3
9.74%
19
4
3.08%
6
5
4.62%
9
6
6.67%
13
7
8.21%
16
8
4.10%
8
9
6.15%
12
10
4.10%
8
11
3.08%
6
12
3.59%
7
13
9.23%
18
14
18.97%
37


Bicycle - On multipurpose trails (10' wide paved trail adjacent to the road)

1
17.01%
33
2
8.25%
16
3
7.22%
14
4
4.64%
9
5
7.22%
14
6
4.12%
8
7
4.12%
8
8
5.15%
10
9
3.09%
6
10
7.22%
14
11
2.06%
4
12
4.64%
9
13
7.73%
15
14
17.53%
34


Bicycle - On sidewalk

1
10.16%
19
2
3.74%
7
3
4.81%
9
4
6.42%
12
5
5.35%
10
6
8.56%
16
7
10.16%
19
8
2.67%
5
9
3.21%
6
10
5.35%
10
11
8.02%
15
12
2.67%
5
13
5.35%
10
14
23.53%
44


Bicycle - On street in a wider outside lane

1
13.09%
25
2
6.28%
12
3
6.81%
13
4
2.62%
5
5
6.81%
13
6
10.99%
21
7
6.28%
12
8
4.71%
9
9
2.09%
4
10
10.99%
21
11
4.19%
8
12
4.19%
8
13
3.66%
7
14
17.28%
33


Bicycle - On street in a separate marked bike lane

1
15.71%
30
2
4.19%
8
3
7.33%
14
4
8.90%
17
5
8.90%
17
6
6.81%
13
7
4.19%
8
8
3.14%
6
9
7.85%
15
10
6.28%
12
11
3.66%
7
12
3.14%
6
13
5.24%
10
14
14.66%
28


Car pool

1
8.90%
17
2
5.24%
10
3
4.71%
9
4
7.33%
14
5
8.38%
16
6
6.28%
12
7
5.76%
11
8
6.28%
12
9
6.81%
13
10
4.71%
9
11
3.14%
6
12
3.66%
7
13
9.95%
19
14
18.85%
36


Park and Ride

1
8.81%
17
2
7.77%
15
3
8.29%
16
4
5.70%
11
5
5.70%
11
6
7.25%
14
7
5.18%
10
8
4.66%
9
9
5.18%
10
10
6.74%
13
11
4.66%
9
12
4.66%
9
13
6.22%
12
14
19.17%
37


Personal car/vehicle

1
57.29%
114
2
5.03%
10
3
3.52%
7
4
3.02%
6
5
2.01%
4
6
5.03%
10
7
2.01%
4
8
1.51%
3
9
2.51%
5
10
0
11
1.01%
2
12
1.01%
2
13
2.51%
5
14
13.57%
27


Train (light rail)

1
17.46%
33
2
10.58%
20
3
3.70%
7
4
6.88%
13
5
4.23%
8
6
4.76%
9
7
5.82%
11
8
5.82%
11
9
2.12%
4
10
6.88%
13
11
3.70%
7
12
4.23%
8
13
2.12%
4
14
21.69%
41


Walk - On Greenways

1
10.05%
19
2
9.52%
18
3
10.58%
20
4
8.47%
16
5
9.52%
18
6
6.35%
12
7
5.82%
11
8
6.88%
13
9
5.82%
11
10
4.23%
8
11
5.29%
10
12
1.06%
2
13
2.12%
4
14
14.29%
27


Walk - On sidewalks

1
11.86%
23
2
13.92%
27
3
12.37%
24
4
4.64%
9
5
7.22%
14
6
9.28%
18
7
2.06%
4
8
6.19%
12
9
8.25%
16
10
4.12%
8
11
4.12%
8
12
1.03%
2
13
1.03%
2
14
13.92%
27


Walk - On multipurpose trails (10' wide paved trail adjacent to the road)

1
10.31%
20
2
5.15%
10
3
8.25%
16
4
9.28%
18
5
10.31%
20
6
6.19%
12
7
6.19%
12
8
4.64%
9
9
6.70%
13
10
9.79%
19
11
4.12%
8
12
4.12%
8
13
1.03%
2
14
13.92%
27


Van pool

1
10.99%
21
2
2.09%
4
3
4.71%
9
4
5.24%
10
5
3.66%
7
6
6.28%
12
7
3.14%
6
8
2.09%
4
9
4.19%
8
10
5.76%
11
11
4.71%
9
12
3.66%
7
13
9.42%
18
14
34.03%
65


11. Next, please let us know how likely you are to actually use each mode for local, non-recreational transportation to/from a destination such as work, shopping, or school. Use the following scale to indicate your likely level of usage:
1 = never
2 = once a year
3 = several times a year
4 = once a month
5 = several times a month
6 = once a week
7 = several times a week
8 = once a day
Bus

1
47.29%
96
2
20.20%
41
3
13.30%
27
4
2.46%
5
5
7.88%
16
6
3.45%
7
7
2.46%
5
8
2.96%
6


Bicycle - On Greenways

1
34.98%
71
2
6.40%
13
3
18.72%
38
4
9.85%
20
5
14.29%
29
6
6.40%
13
7
6.40%
13
8
2.96%
6


Bicycle - On multipurpose trails (10' wide paved trail adjacent to the road)

1
35.15%
71
2
8.42%
17
3
16.83%
34
4
7.43%
15
5
10.40%
21
6
8.91%
18
7
9.41%
19
8
3.47%
7


Bicycle - On sidewalk

1
40.50%
81
2
15.50%
31
3
16.00%
32
4
4.50%
9
5
11.50%
23
6
6.00%
12
7
3.00%
6
8
3.00%
6


Bicycle - On street in a wider outside lane

1
40.50%
81
2
8.50%
17
3
15.00%
30
4
7.00%
14
5
12.00%
24
6
7.50%
15
7
5.00%
10
8
4.50%
9


Bicycle - On street in a separate marked bike lane

1
39.09%
77
2
7.11%
14
3
14.72%
29
4
6.60%
13
5
12.69%
25
6
9.64%
19
7
4.06%
8
8
6.09%
12


Car pool

1
45.27%
91
2
13.43%
27
3
18.91%
38
4
3.48%
7
5
7.46%
15
6
4.48%
9
7
5.47%
11
8
1.49%
3


Park and Ride

1
46.80%
95
2
18.23%
37
3
12.81%
26
4
7.39%
15
5
3.94%
8
6
4.43%
9
7
3.45%
7
8
2.96%
6


Personal car/vehicle

1
5.91%
12
2
0
3
0.49%
1
4
0.99%
2
5
3.45%
7
6
2.46%
5
7
7.39%
15
8
79.31%
161


Train (light rail)

1
32.18%
65
2
17.82%
36
3
12.38%
25
4
7.43%
15
5
10.40%
21
6
7.43%
15
7
4.95%
10
8
7.43%
15


Walk - On Greenways

1
20.40%
41
2
9.95%
20
3
10.95%
22
4
16.92%
34
5
12.94%
26
6
13.93%
28
7
10.45%
21
8
4.48%
9


Walk - On sidewalks

1
12.94%
26
2
8.46%
17
3
8.46%
17
4
14.43%
29
5
12.94%
26
6
17.41%
35
7
13.43%
27
8
11.94%
24


Walk - On multipurpose trails (10' wide paved trail adjacent to the road)

1
24.14%
49
2
10.84%
22
3
12.81%
26
4
10.84%
22
5
11.82%
24
6
14.29%
29
7
10.84%
22
8
4.43%
9


Van pool

1
64.85%
131
2
12.87%
26
3
6.93%
14
4
4.46%
9
5
0.99%
2
6
1.98%
4
7
2.48%
5
8
5.45%
11


12. Pursue implementation of adopted plans like those for Downtown and the Northwest Area (near RTP) to create mixed-use environments featuring increased densities. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
12.00%
24
2
4.00%
8
3
8.00%
16
4
3.00%
6
5
12.00%
24
6
7.00%
14
7
16.00%
32
8
14.00%
28
9
24.00%
48


13. Prepare plans in the southwest (HWY 55 west and north of Green Level West) and south areas (Middle Creek) that focus on lower density development, and emphasize protection of open space and natural areas with appropriately scaled activity centers that serve as focal points. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
5.91%
12
2
3.94%
8
3
1.97%
4
4
2.46%
5
5
7.88%
16
6
7.88%
16
7
14.29%
29
8
13.79%
28
9
41.87%
85


14. Ensure that future development creates a unique sense of place and provides areas – town wide and in neighborhoods – for formal and informal public gatherings. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
5.45%
11
2
1.98%
4
3
1.49%
3
4
1.49%
3
5
12.38%
25
6
7.43%
15
7
16.34%
33
8
21.29%
43
9
32.18%
65


15. Ensure that future development meets strengthened urban design regulations that create both a high quality public realm and private development that promotes human-scale, pedestrian-friendly places. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
5.03%
10
2
2.51%
5
3
1.51%
3
4
2.51%
5
5
7.04%
14
6
7.04%
14
7
18.59%
37
8
15.08%
30
9
40.70%
81


16. Permit future development with evidence of adequate infrastructure, determination of fiscal impact, and compliance with demanding design quality standards while monitoring an expected annual average growth rate of 3% to 4% over a rolling 5-year period. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
7.00%
14
2
4.50%
9
3
3.00%
6
4
1.50%
3
5
6.00%
12
6
8.00%
16
7
19.00%
38
8
19.00%
38
9
32.00%
64


17. Ensure that future growth protects sensitive natural, historical, and cultural resources and preserves open space and the Town’s rural heritage as exemplified by the historic Green Level and Carpenter areas. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
3.98%
8
2
2.49%
5
3
1.99%
4
4
2.49%
5
5
4.48%
9
6
5.47%
11
7
11.44%
23
8
15.92%
32
9
51.74%
104


18. Continue to create an inter-connected system of greenways, parks, and open space. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
4.48%
9
2
1.99%
4
3
1.49%
3
4
2.99%
6
5
3.48%
7
6
3.98%
8
7
9.95%
20
8
14.43%
29
9
57.21%
115


19. Develop large, community-wide parks and smaller neighborhood parks. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
3.45%
7
2
1.48%
3
3
2.46%
5
4
1.97%
4
5
5.42%
11
6
3.45%
7
7
16.26%
33
8
16.75%
34
9
48.77%
99


20. Pursue opportunities to develop mini-parks in infill areas of Town. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
5.97%
12
2
1.00%
2
3
4.98%
10
4
3.48%
7
5
9.95%
20
6
8.96%
18
7
17.91%
36
8
12.44%
25
9
35.32%
71


21. Support the development of special purpose recreational facilities that are regional and national attractions while providing a balance between development of general and specific-use parks. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
12.81%
26
2
2.46%
5
3
7.39%
15
4
6.40%
13
5
11.82%
24
6
14.78%
30
7
13.79%
28
8
13.30%
27
9
17.24%
35


22. Concentrate growth in areas already served by existing or planned infrastructure to minimize costly service area extensions. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
7.00%
14
2
1.50%
3
3
2.00%
4
4
5.00%
10
5
16.50%
33
6
7.50%
15
7
21.50%
43
8
14.50%
29
9
24.50%
49


23. Integrate a full range of housing choices for all income groups, families of various sizes, seniors, and persons with special challenges in new and redeveloped neighborhoods throughout the Town. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
13.30%
27
2
3.94%
8
3
5.42%
11
4
5.42%
11
5
13.79%
28
6
6.90%
14
7
11.82%
24
8
14.29%
29
9
25.12%
51


24. Identify sustainable funding sources for community infrastructure, services, and amenities, including impact fees for recreation needs, open space acquisition, and general community facility needs. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
7.35%
15
2
1.47%
3
3
2.94%
6
4
1.96%
4
5
10.78%
22
6
9.31%
19
7
17.65%
36
8
20.59%
42
9
27.94%
57


25. Maintain a reasonable tax rate while balancing individual burden and community service and facility needs. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
2.96%
6
2
1.48%
3
3
0.49%
1
4
3.45%
7
5
6.40%
13
6
7.88%
16
7
15.27%
31
8
14.78%
30
9
47.29%
96


26. Emphasize high quality, "clean and green" businesses to expand and locate in Cary through a specific recruitment and/or incentive program.

1
4.90%
10
2
2.94%
6
3
2.45%
5
4
1.96%
4
5
9.31%
19
6
11.76%
24
7
18.14%
37
8
10.78%
22
9
37.75%
77


27. Continue to make financial resources available – both public and private – to support capital needs (land acquisition and water, sewer, and road improvements) that facilitate the creation of permanent school seats in Cary, which will be allocated on a project-by-project basis as determined by Council. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
7.88%
16
2
2.96%
6
3
4.93%
10
4
1.48%
3
5
12.81%
26
6
10.84%
22
7
20.69%
42
8
19.21%
39
9
19.21%
39


28. Encourage more school seats/school capacity regardless of whether the schools are public or private. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
8.37%
17
2
2.46%
5
3
6.40%
13
4
4.43%
9
5
14.78%
30
6
10.34%
21
7
18.23%
37
8
18.72%
38
9
16.26%
33


29. Improve the relationship between Wake County School Board representative(s) and the Town's elected officials. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
4.46%
9
2
1.49%
3
3
1.49%
3
4
0
5
10.40%
21
6
5.94%
12
7
13.37%
27
8
19.80%
40
9
43.07%
87


30. Support lobbying of state legislators to separate the governance structure of school boards from boards of county commissioners. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
8.00%
16
2
4.50%
9
3
6.00%
12
4
2.50%
5
5
16.00%
32
6
8.00%
16
7
16.50%
33
8
11.50%
23
9
27.00%
54


31. Work with other local governments to lobby the General Assembly for legislation to allow municipalities and/or counties to impose schools impact fees. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
10.55%
21
2
3.02%
6
3
5.53%
11
4
4.52%
9
5
17.59%
35
6
10.05%
20
7
17.09%
34
8
10.05%
20
9
21.61%
43


32. Improve communication tools for proposed planning and development activities through use of:

a) Notice letters that include a pamphlet summarizing the processes, including citizen involvement opportunities; (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
4.43%
9
2
0.99%
2
3
4.93%
10
4
2.96%
6
5
11.33%
23
6
9.36%
19
7
18.23%
37
8
15.76%
32
9
32.02%
65


b) Notice letters that contain staff and developer contact information and links to the website; (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
5.94%
12
2
0.99%
2
3
4.46%
9
4
2.48%
5
5
6.44%
13
6
12.87%
26
7
21.78%
44
8
10.89%
22
9
34.16%
69


c) Attention to the qualitative aspects of communication materials, making sure they are “user-friendly” and written in plain English—not professional jargon or “legalese”; (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
3.96%
8
2
0.50%
1
3
0
4
0.99%
2
5
5.45%
11
6
7.92%
16
7
17.82%
36
8
16.34%
33
9
47.03%
95


d) A Web page with general process information, a dictionary of terms, and calendars; (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
2.99%
6
2
1.00%
2
3
1.00%
2
4
2.49%
5
5
6.47%
13
6
4.98%
10
7
20.90%
42
8
15.42%
31
9
44.78%
90


e) A Web page for each project with conceptual drawings, statistical data and the like submitted by the developer as well as contact information; (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
2.96%
6
2
2.46%
5
3
1.97%
4
4
2.96%
6
5
7.39%
15
6
6.90%
14
7
12.32%
25
8
14.78%
30
9
48.28%
98


f) Videos for Cary TV 11 outlining processes for citizen input; (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
6.47%
13
2
2.49%
5
3
6.97%
14
4
6.47%
13
5
16.92%
34
6
15.92%
32
7
13.43%
27
8
7.96%
16
9
23.38%
47


g) An informative map with hot links that provide information on engineering projects, redevelopment efforts, rezonings, site plans, land use/zoning categories (with linked explanations), park planning, public works projects, and similar activities. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
1.98%
4
2
0.99%
2
3
2.97%
6
4
1.98%
4
5
7.43%
15
6
6.44%
13
7
12.38%
25
8
15.35%
31
9
50.50%
102


33. Have Council and staff conduct annual Q&A meetings by council districts to talk about proposed projects as well as answer questions. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
2.53%
5
2
2.53%
5
3
2.02%
4
4
4.55%
9
5
10.61%
21
6
9.09%
18
7
20.20%
40
8
16.16%
32
9
32.32%
64


34. Have staff offer to conduct meetings with affected neighborhoods to talk about planning or development projects when they are proposed. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
2.50%
5
2
2.00%
4
3
2.00%
4
4
2.00%
4
5
5.00%
10
6
7.50%
15
7
14.50%
29
8
14.50%
29
9
50.00%
100


35. Strongly recommend that developers meet with affected property owners regularly during the months immediately prior to initiating a planning or development activity. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
3.98%
8
2
0
3
1.49%
3
4
1.00%
2
5
3.48%
7
6
3.98%
8
7
12.94%
26
8
19.90%
40
9
53.23%
107


36. Conduct follow-up research to assess changes in citizen perception. (1= Extremely Unsupportive & 9=Extremely Supportive)

1
4.46%
9
2
1.98%
4
3
2.48%
5
4
0.99%
2
5
10.89%
22
6
8.42%
17
7
16.83%
34
8
16.83%
34
9
37.13%
75


37. Annual Q&A meetings with staff and Council by council districts to talk about proposed projects as well as answer questions. (1=Never Attend and 5=Always Attend)

1
10.45%
21
2
15.92%
32
3
30.35%
61
4
31.84%
64
5
11.44%
23


38. Meetings with affected neighborhoods to talk about planning or development projects when they are proposed. (1=Never Attend and 5=Always Attend)

1
6.40%
13
2
6.90%
14
3
21.18%
43
4
34.98%
71
5
30.54%
62


39. Meetings between developers and affected property owners—when you are one of those property owners directly affected—held regularly during the months immediately prior to initiating a planning or development activity. (1=Never Attend and 5=Always Attend)

1
5.45%
11
2
5.45%
11
3
10.89%
22
4
25.25%
51
5
52.97%
107


40. Meetings between developers and affected property owners—when you are not directly affected—held regularly during the months immediately prior to initiating a planning or development activity. (1=Never Attend and 5=Always Attend)

1
20.20%
41
2
25.62%
52
3
31.03%
63
4
13.30%
27
5
9.85%
20